ForskningsinstitutSvante Arrhenius väg 16A, 114 18 Stockholmsu.se
Mycket bra
2 omdömen · 1 källa
Stockholm University Brain Imaging Centre har betyget 4,4 av 5 från 2 omdömen på Google, där snittet är 5,0.
Omdömena hämtas från källan som står vid varje omdöme. De som är skrivna på Betyga publiceras först när adressen de skrevs från har bekräftats och omdömet har lästs igenom. Vi kontrollerar inte att den som skrivit har varit kund.
I participated in a brain research study at Stockholm University Brain Center and had a very positive experience. The facilities were modern, clean, and well maintained, and the equipment appeared to be new and state of the art. The staff were professional, welcoming, and made the entire process smooth and interesting. Overall, a great experience and an impressive research environment.
Rapportera
Vad platsen erbjuder, enligt uppgifterna vi samlat in.
Trustpilot samlar hela kedjan på en sida, så de här omdömena gäller alla platser och räknas inte in i betyget för den här.
Omdömena hämtas från källan som står vid varje omdöme. De som är skrivna på Betyga publiceras först när adressen de skrevs från har bekräftats och omdömet har lästs igenom. Vi kontrollerar inte att den som skrivit har varit kund.
Disappointing, waste of time and money!
Disappointing, and a waste of time and money. In one lecture, a slide on which countries recognised Indigenous peoples in their constitutions left out Brazil’s 1988 constitution. When a student pointed it out, the teacher said “oh really?” and moved on. When a Brazilian student argued that Brasília’s isolation from the population also served to shield the government from protests, and pointed to the poverty that still surrounds the capital, it was brushed aside rather than discussed. When another student claimed Indigenous languages no longer matter because “we have smartphones and can just translate,” the teacher accepted it without any pushback. In a Latin American Studies program, that should have been challenged. The idea that the Latin American dictatorships would have happened without US involvement was presented as plausible, and critical authors like Chomsky were missing from the reading list. Instead, students were assigned a book, written by an American in the 1980s, that portrayed a family in a Brazilian favela in the harshest light, with no mention that the author’s own country was in the middle of a crack epidemic that hit Black communities especially hard. It also ignored that Brazil’s 1988 constitution had just established universal public healthcare, something the US still doesn’t have today. Criticizing Brazil’s poverty is fair, but the context was missing. If you want critical, open-minded teaching about Latin America, look elsewhere.
RapporteraGeringe Qualität
Geringe Qualität Universität
RapporteraVery happy with this university
Very happy with this university! Started Master this year. I guess the haters just didn't pass their exams 😄
RapporteraThis place is total garbage
This place is total garbage. All its science is science fraud or bad science, and the education is a total scam. The place has an extremely bad reputation and is viewed as a brothel by the locals. Don't waste your money or time at Stockholm University.
Rapportera
Not a good experience.
Not a good experience.
RapporteraForskningsinstitut i Stockholm, högst betyg först. Samma grupp som betygen på sidan jämförs med.
4,5Ibility
Forskningsinstitut · Stockholm
554 omdömen · 2 källor
4,5Nordita
Forskningsinstitut · Stockholm
13 omdömen · 1 källa
4,5Integrated Transport Research Lab
Forskningsinstitut · Stockholm
6 omdömen · 1 källa
4,5Stockholm Environment Institute
Forskningsinstitut · Stockholm
4 omdömen · 1 källa
4,4Swedish House of Finance
Forskningsinstitut · Stockholm
2 omdömen · 1 källa
4,4PDC Center for High Performance Computing
Forskningsinstitut · Stockholm
2 omdömen · 1 källa