ses ses
14 augusti 2022
Fint uni, bra lärare. <33
Rapportera
Omdömen om Institutionen Asien- & Mellanösternstudier
InstitutionUniversitetsvägen 10F, 114 18 Stockholmsu.se
3.9
Bra
12 omdömen · 1 källa
Institutionen Asien- & Mellanösternstudier i Stockholm har betyget 3,9 av 5 från 12 omdömen på Google, där snittet är 3,4.
Omdömen
Omdömena hämtas från källan som står vid varje omdöme. De som är skrivna på Betyga publiceras först när adressen de skrevs från har bekräftats och omdömet har lästs igenom. Vi kontrollerar inte att den som skrivit har varit kund.
SandraLokal guide
14 augusti 202214 omdömen
DanitiwaLokal guide
31 januari 202121 omdömen
My experience with the department of Japanese has overall been very positive. The Japanese department cares for and supports its students and their progress. Most of my teachers have been welcoming to dialogue with their students, and I have never felt ignored by any of them. In fact most people working here are genuinely passionate about their field, and their pedagogy skills are good. The passionate and driven energy is infectious in the best possible way. It's been really difficult to keep up, and very demanding at times, but overall I have found it a joy working on my BA in Japanology at Stockholm University. In large thanks to the staff who were willing to work out compromises, and encourage more effective learning and a better student life at university.
Rapportera
victor delfin (dolfinking)
14 december 20194 omdömen
Bra, trevliga lärare. Fin miljö som verkligen höjer stämningen. Inget fel på lokalerna heller.
Rapportera
Robert Norrgård
24 november 2019
Johan
22 oktober 2019
GILLGAMISH
13 september 20194 omdömen
Great department for those who are interested in learning Arabic the right way! Thank you Wardini, Al Saadi, Al Bitar, and the rest!
Rapportera
Isaiah Blodgett
3 augusti 2019
梁飛
3 augusti 20195 omdömen
This department conducts human subjects research on refugees without approval from an ethics board.
Rapportera
Isaiah Blodgett
3 augusti 20197 omdömen
Egenskaper
Vad platsen erbjuder, enligt uppgifterna vi samlat in.
Tillgänglighet2
- Rullstolsanpassad entré
- Rullstolsanpassad parkering
Omdömen om hela kedjan
Trustpilot samlar hela kedjan på en sida, så de här omdömena gäller alla platser och räknas inte in i betyget för den här.
Omdömena hämtas från källan som står vid varje omdöme. De som är skrivna på Betyga publiceras först när adressen de skrevs från har bekräftats och omdömet har lästs igenom. Vi kontrollerar inte att den som skrivit har varit kund.
The Nonconformist
13 oktober 20268 omdömen
Disappointing, waste of time and money!
Disappointing, and a waste of time and money. In one lecture, a slide on which countries recognised Indigenous peoples in their constitutions left out Brazil’s 1988 constitution. When a student pointed it out, the teacher said “oh really?” and moved on. When a Brazilian student argued that Brasília’s isolation from the population also served to shield the government from protests, and pointed to the poverty that still surrounds the capital, it was brushed aside rather than discussed. When another student claimed Indigenous languages no longer matter because “we have smartphones and can just translate,” the teacher accepted it without any pushback. In a Latin American Studies program, that should have been challenged. The idea that the Latin American dictatorships would have happened without US involvement was presented as plausible, and critical authors like Chomsky were missing from the reading list. Instead, students were assigned a book, written by an American in the 1980s, that portrayed a family in a Brazilian favela in the harshest light, with no mention that the author’s own country was in the middle of a crack epidemic that hit Black communities especially hard. It also ignored that Brazil’s 1988 constitution had just established universal public healthcare, something the US still doesn’t have today. Criticizing Brazil’s poverty is fair, but the context was missing. If you want critical, open-minded teaching about Latin America, look elsewhere.
RapporteraA
Alexander
26 augusti 2026
Geringe Qualität
Geringe Qualität Universität
RapporteraP
Peter
28 december 20256 omdömen
Very happy with this university
Very happy with this university! Started Master this year. I guess the haters just didn't pass their exams 😄
RapporteraM
Mr. Johansson
8 oktober 202548 omdömen
This place is total garbage
This place is total garbage. All its science is science fraud or bad science, and the education is a total scam. The place has an extremely bad reputation and is viewed as a brothel by the locals. Don't waste your money or time at Stockholm University.
Rapportera
Elli
21 juni 20243 omdömen
Not a good experience.
Not a good experience.
RapporteraLiknande företag i Stockholm
Se allaInstitution i Stockholm, högst betyg först. Samma grupp som betygen på sidan jämförs med.
4,5KTH Entré
Institution · Stockholm
170 omdömen · 1 källa
4,5KTH SEED
Institution · Stockholm
5 omdömen · 1 källa
4,5KTH - D- och E-husen
Institution · Stockholm
17 omdömen · 1 källa
4,4KTH Department of Speech, Music and Hearing - Institutionen för Tal, Musik och Hörsel
Institution · Stockholm
6 omdömen · 1 källa
4,4Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Inst f kemi
Institution · Stockholm
4 omdömen · 1 källa
4,4KTH Maskin
Institution · Stockholm
2 omdömen · 1 källa